From: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:06:00 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-stash: alias 'list' to 'ls' and 'clear' to 'rm'
Message-ID: <D512F3C0-3354-40BB-BD8D-8B3A85196825@wincent.com>
In-Reply-To: <1202207899-28578-1-git-send-email-tim@stoakes.net>

El 5/2/2008, a las 11:38, Tim Stoakes escribió:

> clear::
> +rm::
> 	Remove all the stashed states. Note that those states will then
> 	be subject to pruning, and may be difficult or impossible to recover.

Isn't "rm" a bit misleading here? Seeing as the clear subcommand  
really does an "rm -rf".

Also, is there any other precedent in the command suite for  
abbreviating subcommand names in that way (ie. not just by shortening  
them, but by using alternative names based on filesystem commands)? It  
strikes me as a bit inconsistent.

Cheers,
Wincent