From: Philip Oakley Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:07:18 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] for-each-ref: introduce %(upstream:track[short]) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: From: "Ramkumar Ramachandra" > Philip Oakley wrote: >> "=" and "<>" I can easily understand (binary choice), but ">" and "<" >> will >> need to be clear which way they indicate in terms of matching >> the "[ahead N]" and "[behind M]" options. > > The ">" corresponds to ahead, while "<" is behind. You'll get used to > it pretty quickly :) > But this documentation section could say ;-) >>> diff --git a/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt >>> b/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt regards Philip