From: Kyle J. McKay Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:48:41 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Use the same source directory for "ln -s" as for "ln" / "cp" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Feb 5, 2015, at 07:51, Sebastian Schuberth wrote: > For consistency, we should use the same source for symbolic links as > for > hard links and copies. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth > --- > Makefile | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > index c44eb3a..21f23cb 100644 > --- a/Makefile > +++ b/Makefile > @@ -2265,14 +2265,14 @@ endif > $(RM) "$$bindir/$$p" && \ > test -z "$(NO_INSTALL_HARDLINKS)" && \ > ln "$$bindir/git$X" "$$bindir/$$p" 2>/dev/null || \ > - ln -s "git$X" "$$bindir/$$p" 2>/dev/null || \ > + ln -s "$$bindir/git$X" "$$bindir/$$p" 2>/dev/null || \ This is wrong. Currently with symlinks you will get installed into bindir something like this: git git-tag -> git git-show -> git etc. With your change you would have git git-tag -> /usr/local/libexec/git-core/git git-show -> /usr/local/libexec/git-core/git And I don't think we want that. While those absolute path symlinks are technically correct, what we have now is much simpler. While there are a number of build-time paths hard-coded into the executables, the binaries work for the most part if you relocate them as a whole. Your change totally breaks that. -Kyle