From: Jaime Soriano Pastor Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:22:30 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Check order when reading index Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Yes---that is what I meant by the "virtual stuff". Unlike resolve > work by Daniel (around Sep 2005 $gmane/8088) that tried to use > multiple ancestors directly in a single merge, recursive limits > itself to repeated use of pairwise merges. Ok, I see now. Then what about checking also in check_ce_order() that only stage #1 can be repeated?