From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 00:20:45 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] docs: clarify git-branch --list behavior
Message-ID: <CAPig+cT21Fx6BaD=1jT7KSBZSZkWu-A-0U+QsM2qO8g5gki=YQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130131064545.GA25315@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> +If `--list` is given, or if there are no non-option arguments, existing
> +branches are listed; the current branch will be highlighted with an
> +asterisk.  Option `-r` causes the remote-tracking branches to be listed,
> +and option `-a` shows both local and remote branches. If a `<pattern>`
> +is given, it is used as a shell wildcard to restrict the output to
> +matching branches. If multiple patterns are given, a branch is shown if
> +any it is matched by any of the patterns.

s/if any it is/if it is/

-- ES