From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 17:22:22 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config.c: fix regression for core.safecrlf false
Message-ID: <CAPig+cSm7My9r8KN1vNyssendf_v_nMARDAq6ALA=X7nZ+spkA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+dzEB=7tGeXduxdKrJpDpXrmNbb_ZnYg=CmByJ7J-w-iiyxsQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Anthony Sottile <asottile@umich.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 10:17 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Anthony Sottile <asottile@umich.edu> wrote:
>>>> +       for w in I am all CRLF; do echo $w; done | append_cr >allcrlf &&
>>>
>>> Simpler: printf "%s\n" I am all CRLF | append_cr >allcrlf &&
>>
>> Or even simpler:
>>
>> printf "%s\r\n" I am all CRLF >allcrlf &&
>
> Yeah, I just copied the line in my test from another test in this file
> which was doing a ~similar thing. [...]

Thanks for pointing that out. In that case, it's following existing
practice, thus certainly not worth a re-roll.