From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 21:28:43 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] http-push: ensure unforced pushes fail when data would be lost
Message-ID: <CAPig+cSPwR_0xR5X50dbBAJ9EJKqP7Vyu_e3jsq_WOg=B0tKXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200623202129.2616672-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>

On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 5:23 PM brian m. carlson
<sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
> When we push using the DAV-based protocol, the client is the one that
> performs the ref updates and therefore makes the checks to see whether
> an unforced push should be allowed.  We make this check by determining
> if either (a) we lack the object file for the old value of the ref or
> (b) the new value of the ref is not newer than the old value, and in
> either case, reject the push.
> [...]
> Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>

Do you want a "Reported-by: Michael Ward <mward@smartsoftwareinc.com>"
in this vicinity?