From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 20:12:03 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] describe: setup working tree for --dirty
Message-ID: <CAPig+cQgEVJ6OGn9BRUJoALxE7aDCHK308sq7V0EQVRRn6Vn8g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190201135512.68220-1-koraktor@gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:55 AM Sebastian Staudt <koraktor@gmail.com> wrote:
> We don't use NEED_WORK_TREE when running the git-describe builtin,
> since you should be able to describe a commit even in a bare repository.
> However, the --dirty flag does need a working tree. Since we don't call
> setup_work_tree(), it uses whatever directory we happen to be in. That's
> unlikely to match our index, meaning we'd say "dirty" even when the real
> working tree is clean.
> [...]
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Staudt <koraktor@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/t/t6120-describe.sh b/t/t6120-describe.sh
> @@ -145,14 +145,38 @@ check_describe A-* HEAD
> +test_expect_success 'describe --dirty with --work-tree' '
> +       [...]
> +'
>
> +test_expect_success 'describe --dirty with --work-tree' '
> +       [...]
> +'

Can you give these two new tests different titles to make it easier to
narrow down a problem to one or the other if one of them does fail?
Perhaps the second test could be titled:

    test_expect_success 'describe --dirty with dirty --work-tree' '

or something.