From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 04:52:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/22] git-remote-mediawiki: Check return value of open + remove import of unused open2
Message-ID: <CAPig+cQbTGGn8-cHySj4_rQ9dbtoLEhC+9RbJhDeHLpQ0L1xLw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51B37BB0.7000504@ensimag.fr>

On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Célestin Matte
<celestin.matte@ensimag.fr> wrote:
> Le 08/06/2013 20:41, Matthieu Moy a écrit :
>> Célestin Matte <celestin.matte@ensimag.fr> writes:
>>
>>> Le 08/06/2013 02:14, Eric Sunshine a écrit :
>>>> These two changes are unrelated and could be split into distinct
>>>> patches (IMHO, though others may disagree).
>>>
>>> Two distinct patches or two distinct commits?
>>
>> That's the same. You write commits locally, send them as patches, and
>> Junio uses "git am" to turn the patches back into commits.
>>
>
> Oh, I thought a part of a patch was called a commit. So the question was
> rather: "Should it be sent to this list independently from this series
> of patches?".

Terms "patch" and "commit" tend to be used interchangeably, as Matthieu notes.

There is no need to send the split up patches to the list
independently from this series.