From: Eric Sunshine Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:00:50 GMT Subject: Re: man git-config inconsistency (*.fsckObjects) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160208150856.GB13664@sigill.intra.peff.net> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 02:41:44PM +0000, Markus Kuhn wrote: >> Suggested rephrasing: >> >> If not set, the value of transfer.fsckObjects is used >> instead, which defaults to false. > > Yeah, I agree your phrasing is much clearer. Should we worry about this becoming outdated if the default of transfer.fsckObjects ever changes, or is that being overcautious? If it is a legitimate concern, then perhaps drop "which defaults to false" from the end of the sentence.