From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:18:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] t4211: demonstrate empty -L range crash
Message-ID: <CAPig+cQJn+9eNcQZ6PBPVJ4firFs3LNetDMKo4BbF9kFVjKRfg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vbo5s6ljb.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> writes:
>>>> You could avoid the 'cat' here and patch in 4/5 by doing $(wc -l <b.c).
>>> Correct.
>>
>> Thanks, I like that better.
>>
>> Unfortunately, what actually got queued on 'next', after applying this
>> fix-up and re-ordering the patch series, is slightly bogus.
>
> The lesson is that one should not rebase while waiting for a flight
> in a hurry X-<.
>
> Will queue the following on top.

Thanks, that looks fine.