From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:33:38 GMT
Subject: Re: New orphan worktree?
Message-ID: <CAPig+cQ5aLEzpUwFAkofd86HjJsJnJ-DtRKkrrkF0EdjHnJm4g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqmtvv64dp.fsf@gitster.g>

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 6:59 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
> > When I was pondering the issue before writing my original response,
> > two thoughts came to mind. (1) "git worktree add --force --orphan
> > <branch>" would be one way to make your case work; (2) given how
> > infrequently --orphan is used, we just punt and require people to
> > first use "git branch -D <branch>" if necessary (which has been the
> > status-quo for git-branch and git-switch).
>
> FWIW, as I personally view that branch -d/-D, checkout -b/-B, and
> switch -c/-C were all mistakes (they should have been -d, -b and -c
> with and without --force, respectively), I find the combination of
> "--force --orphan" a reasonable way forward.

I'm also leaning toward `git worktree add --force --orphan <branch>`
as a way forward. Indeed, `git worktree add --force -b <branch>` is a
sensible extension even without --orphan being part of the equation,
and it's easy to frame -B in documentation as equivalent to `--force
-b`.