From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 13:42:34 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] replace: refactor replacing parents
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD3wSxYVuwSLApQikEbXgsvU2H=6PQ-tmvRjdBinDNmGVA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtx6zfp3m.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
>> ---
>>  builtin/replace.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/builtin/replace.c b/builtin/replace.c
>> index 3515979..ad47237 100644
>> --- a/builtin/replace.c
>> +++ b/builtin/replace.c
>> @@ -295,27 +295,14 @@ static int edit_and_replace(const char *object_ref, int force)
>>       return replace_object_sha1(object_ref, old, "replacement", new, force);
>>  }
>>
>> -static int create_graft(int argc, const char **argv, int force)
>> +static void replace_parents(struct strbuf *buf, int argc, const char **argv)
>
> It is somewhat strange to see that a new function introduced earlier
> in the series is rewritten with a "refactoring".  Shouldn't the new
> function have been done right from the beginning instead?

Yeah, I will do it right from the beginning in the next patch series.