From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 06:10:31 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bisect: don't use invalid oid as rev when starting
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD3mfPgedqGk0ZFp3K3r1gDA3-stbSxoEomRh4T0_qH+tg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa6xgi363.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 11:39 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > From f673cea53e046774847be918f4023430e56bf6cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 19:09:15 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] bisect: don't use invalid oid as rev when starting
> > ...
> > diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> > index 93e855271b9..d11d4c9bbb5 100644
> > --- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c
> > +++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
>
> Unfortunately this does not apply to the broken commit or 'master'
> or anywhere else, it seems (no such blob as 93e855271b9 found at the
> path).
>
> It is better to make it applicable at least to 'master'.  Making it
> also apply to 'maint' is optional, I would say, as the bug it fixes
> is not so critical.

Sorry, I don't know what happened. It seemed to me that my branch was
based on master, but maybe I did something wrong.

Hopefully the V2 I just sent will be better anyway.