From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 13:01:16 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 63/83] builtin/apply: make apply_all_patches() return -1 on error
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD3NXo4vMBK9-3LChWcoSj7y_nKeea-RLyGmdy7kVvhabA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cSVCDNRup95ay=htiXiw0UCGs6boDuqovGnQJY8imbFhQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:03 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
>> @@ -4590,10 +4590,10 @@ static int apply_all_patches(struct apply_state *state,
>>                                 squelched);
>>                 }
>>                 if (state->ws_error_action == die_on_ws_error)
>> -                       die(Q_("%d line adds whitespace errors.",
>> -                              "%d lines add whitespace errors.",
>> -                              state->whitespace_error),
>> -                           state->whitespace_error);
>> +                       return error(Q_("%d line adds whitespace errors.",
>> +                                       "%d lines add whitespace errors.",
>> +                                       state->whitespace_error),
>> +                                    state->whitespace_error);
>
> How does this new 'return' relate to the logic below which updates the
> index? Does the index need to be updated here now too?

I think it is the right thing to do not to update the index when there
are whitespaces and state->ws_error_action == die_on_ws_error.