From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 08:11:51 GMT
Subject: Re: [WIP/PATCH v4 6/8] for-each-ref: rename some functions and make them public
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD1TTMfruCE-+GT-LzhK5C9LorStPbn64tZ-hhAkC=8Bdw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD080Yuv-CYcDzAG0u6OV7Sqry=0s1HKoJbt5wfKjTNO3Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Christian Couder
<christian.couder@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> -static void sort_refs(struct ref_sort *sort, struct ref_array *array)
>> +void sort_ref_array(struct ref_sort *sort, struct ref_array *array)
>
> It is probably better to call the above function ref_array_sort()...
>
> [...]
>
>> -static struct ref_sort *default_sort(void)
>> +/*  If no sorting option is given, use refname to sort as default */
>> +struct ref_sort *ref_default_sort(void)
>
> ... especially since you call the above ref_default_sort()...
>
>> -static int opt_parse_sort(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
>> +int opt_parse_ref_sort(const struct option *opt, const char *arg, int unset)
>
> ... and the above opt_parse_sort().

After saying that I realize that these two other functions are not
doing the same thing.
This might suggest that they are not named very well as well.