From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:39:56 GMT
Subject: Re: Git performance results on a large repository
Message-ID: <CAP8UFD1RTa6+btjJrsfqjOOoCjebZBqK6xkPN7ZVLM04bHO9yw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8DQNHm8sTgxKL=+Ui5OBsJBpvPn+dRmN9bVMwq4TfNuxQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> All these involve unpack_trees(), which is full tree operation. The
> bigger your worktree is, the slower it is. Another good reason to
> split unrelated parts into separate repositories.

Maybe having different "views" would be enough to make a smaller
worktree and history, so that things are much faster for a developper?

(I already suggested "views" based on "git replace" in this thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/177146/focus=177639)

Best regards,
Christian.