From: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:10:24 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] revisions passed to cherry-pick should be in "default" order
Message-ID: <CAOeW2eENsnrPqBL795FcwMgHURS6YsPBW6FYvb=DwD-UtgPZ5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50289e50.a19f320a.5d99.3fdfSMTPIN_ADDED@gmr-mx.google.com>

On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:27 PM,  <y@google.com> wrote:
> From: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
>
> 'git cherry-pick' internally sets the --reverse option while walking
> revisions, so that 'git cherry-pick branch@{u}..branch' will apply the
> revisions starting at the oldest one.

By the way, I can see the usefulness of --reverse when giving a range,
but I think it's a little confusing when not giving a range. So "git
cherry-pick A B" will apply B first, then A. I thought I'd mention
that explicitly in case it wasn't clear.