From: Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantoranz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 04:33:49 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] blame: add support for --[no-]progress option
Message-ID: <CAOc6etYBT_PBknCMuSr4=ARke-sNY8-YrO9yp20v7NkzDwrsMQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5653FC4D.4090201@web.de>

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> wrote:
> Minor remark: The '*' should be close to the variable: "struct progress_info
> *pi"

Nice catch, Torsten. I had already caught it as the standard... that
one slipped by.

Was waiting for more comments to show up, but none so far so I'll send
another version with this adjustment.

Thanks again!