From: Karthik Nayak Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 09:54:54 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] files-backend: check symref name before update Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Junio C Hamano writes: > Han Young writes: > >> From: Han Young >> >> In the ref files backend, the symbolic reference name is not checked >> before an update. This could cause reference and lock files to be created >> outside the refs/ directory. Validate the reference before adding it to >> the ref update transaction. >> >> Reported-by: Sigma >> Signed-off-by: Han Young >> --- >> refs/files-backend.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/refs/files-backend.c b/refs/files-backend.c >> index bc3347d18..d47a8c392 100644 >> --- a/refs/files-backend.c >> +++ b/refs/files-backend.c >> @@ -2516,6 +2516,16 @@ static enum ref_transaction_error split_symref_update(struct ref_update *update, >> struct ref_update *new_update; >> unsigned int new_flags; >> >> + /* >> + * Check the referent is valid before adding it to the transaction. >> + */ >> + if (!refname_is_safe(referent)) { > > Shouldn't this new condition share the logic with what is done by > fsck? IOW, after doing this > > $ echo ref: refs/../HEAD > .git/HEAD > > "git fsck" or "git refs verify" should barf (if not, we should make > them barf), and this code should use the same logic to notice that > the target of the symbolic ref is bogus. > Good point. I see that 'git fsck' does complain about this: $ git fsck Checking ref database: 100% (1/1), done. Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done. error: invalid HEAD dangling commit ccd1771e44a18887197d3ee26ca37c2e892b9fb6 dangling commit f99d68ea2c378218e2360dee4e24115c404f6a66 However 'git refs verify' doesn't... $ git refs verify --verbose Checking references consistency Checking refs/heads/master Checking packed-refs file .git/packed-refs Okay, so this seems like because fsck also parses all references to mark reachability and also parses 'HEAD' via `refs_resolve_ref_unsafe()` which fails. This symref checks and checking root refs is definitely something we should consider adding to 'git refs verify'. [snip]