From: Karthik Nayak Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:31:29 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] for-each-ref: add %(upstream:gone) to mark missing refs Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Hello, >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:03 AM, Jeff King wrote: >>> >>> Ah, right. I was feeling like this was all vaguely familiar. I think >>> it would be better to push forward kn/ref-filter-branch-list. >>> According to the last "what's cooking", I think that topic is waiting >>> on more review. If you're willing and able to do so, that would be a >>> big help. >>> >> >> It's been waiting for review for a _long_ time now. >> > > To be perfectly honest my C skills and familiarity with the git source > code is not much to speak of. I very much want to take a close look but > I cannot promise anything worth your time... > > But if I do find something I'd like to point out should I just reply > directly to the e-mails containing the patches as one usually does even > though they're months old at this point? > Not that your review would be absolute but it definitely would be a start. Replying directly to the patches is the way to go I feel. -- Regards, Karthik Nayak