From: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 10:35:38 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] builtin/gc: use designated field initializers for maintenance tasks
Message-ID: <CAOLa=ZSy5XoKJ2OaKv3DukY9ko-pkpa2zHLQneLwq=9+wJnYWg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20250602-b4-pks-maintenance-ref-lock-race-v3-1-587d44252dcb@pks.im>

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> Convert the array of maintenance tasks to use designated field
> initializers. This makes it easier to add more fields to the struct
> without having to modify all tasks.
>

I was wondering why we don't catch missing field initializers when not
using designators. Seems like we explicitly set
'-Wno-missing-field-initializers'. Perhaps something to slowly tackle
over time.

The patch looks good.

[snip]