From: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 20:30:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] branch: use ref-filter printing APIs
Message-ID: <CAOLa=ZSvCdwV9fzvEHVUbX4=sAAWsO3UK-h1b3hXVvUgqFHujQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ79kYUGue5r773BMjPALSAN0U2MRnq8kpDpfn_o9npfBDxLA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> wrote:
>>  static int calc_maxwidth(struct ref_array *refs, int remote_bonus)
>>  {
>>         int i, max = 0;
>> @@ -432,7 +281,10 @@ static int calc_maxwidth(struct ref_array *refs, int remote_bonus)
>>
>>                 skip_prefix(it->refname, "refs/heads/", &desc);
>>                 skip_prefix(it->refname, "refs/remotes/", &desc);
>> -               w = utf8_strwidth(desc);
>> +               if (it->kind == FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD)
>> +                       w = strlen(get_head_description());
>
> get_head_description returns memory, which needs to be free'd.
> (found by catching up on reading the coverity scan log. I see
> you deleted get_head_description in another part of the patch;
> nevertheless would you like to take care of this memleak?)

Seems like an easy fix. Will take care of it, Thanks :)

-- 
Regards,
Karthik Nayak