From: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 11:09:35 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] wt-status: pass struct repository and wt_status through function parameters
Message-ID: <CAOLa=ZSkTH8KC04KubktP1EkU4EHYs0CtmUPkPVe74zi0wcTBA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20260205101524.125452-3-shreyanshpaliwalcmsmn@gmail.com>

Shreyansh Paliwal <shreyanshpaliwalcmsmn@gmail.com> writes:

> Some functions in wt-status.c relied on the_repository because no
> repository instance was available in their local scope.
> There is also a specific case in wt_status_check_rebase() where the
> worktree can be NULL, so accessing wt->repo may lead to a segfault.
>
> Update these functions to accept a struct repository or struct
> wt_status parameter, and adjust callers accordingly. Replace the
> remaining uses of the_repository in these functions with the
> passed-in repository instance.
>
> This removes the use of the_repository global variable from
> wt-status.c completely.
>

Okay, but this doesn't fix the issue I stated in the previous commit. I
do wonder if we can re-order the commits and pass the repo struct to
functions like 'get_branch()'.

[snip]