From: Karthik Nayak Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 21:29:32 GMT Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2025, #02) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Junio C Hamano writes: > Karthik Nayak writes: > >>>>> Expecting a (hopefully small and final) reroll. >>>>> cf. >>>>> source: <20251121-fix-tags-not-fetching-v8-0-23b53a8a8334@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> The only change needed from the last review was a typo. I think we should be >>>> good as is. >>> >>> Meaning that we prefer to leave the typo in, or just we won't die >>> with a known typo? >> >> The typo was in a comment in the tests, so I thought it wasn't worth >> re-rolling, but happy to do so. > > I went back to the discussion to find that single typo and tweaked > it myself in my tree, so no need to resend. > > Thanks. > > > diff --git c/t/t5510-fetch.sh w/t/t5510-fetch.sh > index a1ca4e1ac7..ce1c23684e 100755 > --- c/t/t5510-fetch.sh > +++ w/t/t5510-fetch.sh > @@ -1628,7 +1628,7 @@ test_expect_success "backfill tags when providing a refspec" ' > test_commit fetch-me > ) && > > - # The "history" tag is backfilled eventhough we requested > + # The "history" tag is backfilled even though we requested > # to only fetch HEAD > git -C target fetch origin HEAD:branch && > git -C target tag -l >actual && Thanks for handling it. This looks good to me :)