From: Karthik Nayak Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:05:38 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/19] for-each-ref: add '--merged' and '--no-merged' options Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 4:11 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote: > > According to the documentation you added to the OPTIONS section, the > object following --merged and --no-merged is optional. Therefore, > shouldn't this be s//[]/ ? > > Also, in the OPTIONS section, you spelled it "commit" rather than "object". > > > Ditto: s//[]/ > Noted and changed, this would apply to --contains also :) -- Regards, Karthik Nayak