From: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:19:09 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] branch.c: use 'ref-filter' data structures
Message-ID: <CAOLa=ZQVwECZ=0oJdFcCWJwAUf7gYaF5pGweKDAFpfJujw-Q1A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <vpqy4gatshr.fsf@anie.imag.fr>

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Matthieu Moy
<Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:
> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>       /* Print detached HEAD before sorting and printing the rest */
>> -     if (detached) {
>> -             print_ref_item(&ref_list.list[index - 1], maxwidth, verbose, abbrev,
>> -                            detached, remote_prefix);
>> -             index -= 1;
>> +     if (filter->kind & FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD) {
>> +             print_ref_item(array.items[array.nr - 1], maxwidth, filter, remote_prefix);
>> +             free_array_item(array.items[array.nr - 1]);
>> +             array.nr--;
>
> Ah, this answers my previous remark: indeed, you are removing the
> element from the array completely after this patch. You may want to
> modify the previous patch to start doing it earlier, but I think it's
> not worth the trouble: I agree with the final state, only the
> intermediate state is suboptimal (but still acceptable to me at least).
>

Yes! Eric suggested this. It doesn't make much sense in the previous
patch, cause I'd have to introduce something along the lines of
free_array_item() only to be removed/replaced here.

-- 
Regards,
Karthik Nayak