From: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 16:05:19 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 01/10] ref-filter: introduce a parsing function for each atom in valid_atom
Message-ID: <CAOLa=ZQKQE-iyNY2gyZXMxPANHzJr0GoDJVuts3qb-izDKVVsQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqio44eijo.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> This problem will go away if you introduce the 'valid_atom' field in
>>> the patch which actually needs it (as suggested above) rather than in
>>> this patch.
>>
>> Yup, agreed.
>> Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> In addition, most of the lines in this patch should become
> unnecessary even after you start using the "parser" field.
>
> As the majority of fields are compared as strings, and only a
> selected few fields need custom parsers, you do not have to
> explicitly write FIELD_STR everywhere, as long as you make sure the
> value of FIELD_STR is zero (and use parser==NULL as a sign that no
> custom parser is used, which I think you already do).

True, currently I've changed it to only add the new parser function values
only wherever required.

-- 
Regards,
Karthik Nayak