From: Igor Lautar Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:24:53 GMT Subject: Re: commit gone after merge - how to debug? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1353935441-ner-9639@calvin> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Tomas Carnecky wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:06:09 +0100, Igor Lautar wrote: >> git log >> - commit NOT shown in file history any more and file does not have this change > > does `git log --full-history ` show the commit? Indeed it does. Did the merge with verbosity set to 5. It says the commit I'm merging in is virtual (probably as it is a merge commit in itself?). Why would commit be left behind after merge? What kind of history triggers this scenario? Just trying to understand reasoning as its counter-intuitive to what I know now. This may affect our workflow (ie., change it so we avoid it happening).