From: Gabor Bernat <bernat@primeranks.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 09:50:21 GMT
Subject: Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] Filter-branch extend progress with a simple estimated time remaning
Message-ID: <CANy2qHd_GTxr2CsjxLiNCvdwMLtEqcmURUTfFv9+t16FMEjuiw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150826021517.GA20292@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Hello,

Here's what I ended up using, and seemed to work well:
https://github.com/gaborbernat/git/commit/766841bc1b726a5d6e7e051938b82975368695a0

Does this looks okay, should I create a patch from this?

Thanks,
Bernát GÁBOR


On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:15 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:12:54PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>
>> > A little googling came up with:
>> >
>> >     awk 'END { print systime() }' </dev/null
>> >
>> > which probably (?) works everywhere.
>>
>> On Mac OS X and FreeBSD:
>>
>>     $ awk 'END { print systime() }' </dev/null
>>     awk: calling undefined function systime
>>     source line number 1
>>     $
>
> Oh, well. The reference I saw was that the old Kernighan nawk had it,
> but that seems not to be the case:
>
>   http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~bwk/btl.mirror/
>
> "date +%s" seems to work on OS X, and so presumably on other BSDs. No
> clue what would work on stuff like SunOS, AIX, etc.
>
> -Peff