From: Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 19:18:57 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/14] core.fsyncmethod: batched disk flushes for loose-objects
Message-ID: <CANQDOdcVnyEo1Om=Odutix1ZT4vbNiZX29_Zo+=PfxnssmUM9g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtube2e1d.fsf@gitster.g>

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:05 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > To describe the above if it doesn't render correctly, we have a
> > bulleted list where the batch after the * is bolded.  Other instances
> > of single backtick quoted text just appears as plaintext. The
> > descriptive "Currently `batch` mode..." paragraph is under the bullet
> > point and well-indented.
> >
> > In HTML the output looks good as well, except that the descriptive
> > paragraph is in monospace for some reason.
>
> The "except" part admits that it does not render well, no?
>
> What happens if you modify the second and subsequent paragraph after
> the "+" continuation in the way suggested?  Does it make it worse,
> or does it make it worse?
>

Apologies, I misinterpreted your statement that the input "has to be
flushed left without indentation".  Now that I flushed it left I'm
getting better output where the follow-on paragraph has a "normal"
text style and interior backtick quoted things are bolded as expected.

This will be fixed in the next iteration.