From: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:05:11 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] index-format.txt: document SHA-256 index format
Message-ID: <CAN0heSrOyLJ-fpjJMY9tYXjnz5s8tAdcGMnef8WfJBUgAU1f_A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e9963ef1-cecd-cdf8-a5cf-2be884d8ced6@gmail.com>

On Fri, 14 Aug 2020 at 14:28, Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/14/2020 8:21 AM, Martin Ågren wrote:
> > -   - 160-bit SHA-1 over the content of the index file before this
> > +   - 160-bit hash checksum over the content of the index file before this
> >       checksum.
>
> If this hash is flexible, then "160-bit" is not correct anymore, right?
>
> > -  160-bit SHA-1 for the represented object
> > +  160-bit object name for the represented object
>
> Same here. The later instances of "160-bit" were dropped.

Thanks for pointing out these errors.


Martin