From: Derek Moore <derek.p.moore@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:42:39 GMT
Subject: Re: Some PRETTY FORMATS format:<string> options don't work with git-archive export-subst $Format:$
Message-ID: <CAMsgyKYKAUXamcGOtUi3Bq-u4B9JaG2sk-Gttf+A1U2mwhghrw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMsgyKb_-Xm0DH1-xVZa0XHs59nZsOxGwwLWKx-YiTmsJtrFHQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Derek Moore <derek.p.moore@gmail.com> wrote:
> I first noticed this using the system git provided in Fedora 21, so I
> cloned the official git repo, built from source, and it would appear
> there are even more options that don't work with export-subst in the
> latest code.

I'm a dumb ass. After installing my newly compiled git to /usr/local,
I neglected to spawn a new shell so the new binary could get picked up
by my $PATH. Despite /usr/local/bin preceding /usr/bin, /usr/bin/git
was cached by my shell, and 'which git' was lying to me, therefore my
testing of new format:<string> options was invalid.

I must retract the statement "and it would appear there are even more
options that don't work with export-subst in the latest code."

As far as I've tested it would seem only %N doesn't resolve inside of
$Format:$, until I maybe do unit tests for this to identify any
others.