From: Albert Cui <albertqcui@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 23:42:14 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hooks: propose project configured hooks
Message-ID: <CAMbkP-TL3f9V4bGp3bDq_7=E47JKdh5ua2giRZKaUrvODOPWew@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8735w9knx4.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 2:59 AM Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 26 2021, Albert Cui via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
> > From: Albert Cui <albertqcui@gmail.com>
>
> Formatting nit:
>
> > +Git has https://git-scm.com/docs/githooks[hooks] functionality to allow users to
> > [...]
> > +local checks of code e.g. linting. As documented in
> > +https://git-scm.com/docs/gitfaq#_hooks[gitfaq], in some cases, server-side
> > +checks may be more appropriate, especially since developers can always skip
>
> This should be a linkgit:* even in the technical/ directory, should it
> not? We build docs on git-scm.com (among others), but in our source tree
> we should be using linking syntax, not linking to our own already-built
> docs on some website.

Yes, thanks. Good catch.