From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:45:13 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] remote-hg: general updates
Message-ID: <CAMP44s3eMe9O12Jp7LRoVYy-Hf_9+cuVTcex5u51yERj+xKO8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s02PUGctgacuGRw3p8uEXhowZJWJjdq0g9aO9bBbpnv2w@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
<felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Max Horn <max@quendi.de> wrote:

>> * internally, the marks are using the hg sha1s instead of the hg rev ids. The latter are not necessarily invariant, and using the sha1s makes it much easier to recover from semi-broken states.
>
> I will investigate the pros and cons of this, but either way it's not
> something people are going to immediately need (I doubt the
> semi-broken states will happen again).

And another one bites the dust:
https://github.com/felipec/git/commits/fc/remote/hg-noteids

-- 
Felipe Contreras