From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:42:42 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] add: avoid yoda conditions
Message-ID: <CAMP44s3CnoLAUu=R4FCFWGyJpn58oTZgzQKgF7wE1hUnutv84w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqmwlp41xd.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:

> I agree that there is no justification to write "if 0 == something",
> when "if something == 0" suffices.  The latter reads better and that
> is why the phrase "yoda condition" was invented.
>
> But the situation is different when both sides are not constants,
> and especially when "<" and "<=" are involved..

To me revs.nr is virtually a constant, I'm comparing i to revs.nr, not
the other way around.

I believe I explained this already, but here it goes again:

if (1.60 < john.size)

This makes no sense, "if 1.69 is smaller than john"?

The situation doesn't change when you use a variable:

if (size_limit < john.size)

Translates to "if size limit is smaller than john", and still makes no sense.

-- 
Felipe Contreras