From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 20:37:51 GMT
Subject: Re: git rebase issue
Message-ID: <CAMP44s2hEudOpOcyXzZQNYtQSHXOd4NiPBboH=90RHEgF_Lamg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VeMoXZdr++6BiOMhOnSqm5rPe+t0bNzpLJsCuGp8NU=wA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:11 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 7:02 PM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:

> > Adding its author to the cc, who may be able to say more. But my
> > understanding is that this was probably fixing a bug (though I don't
> > know all the implications of having a branch checked out in multiple
> > worktrees).
>
> Note, in my case it's "checked" in the BARE repository, which means
> it's actually not.
> This case shouldn't be an impediment or racy AFAIU.

In that case I agree it should work, but when I tried to reproduce the
issue the bare repository is ignored, only worktrees are considered.

Are you sure the branch isn't checked out in other worktree(s)?

-- 
Felipe Contreras