From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:00:34 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] refs.c: interpret @ as HEAD
Message-ID: <CAMP44s1LJg9kcBVMb8YxJDTEpKerJoN5td7276=JB7ZY6APpZw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0kcuaXTKbafmC72C3H+UZN6oeEY140T21LJUHveO=UBvA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
<artagnon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> @{-1}@{0} does.  That means @{0} is a revision and not a ref, but @{-1}
>> is.
>
> Right.  I missed that.
>
>> '"@" given alone' has to be a ref if we want @@{5.minutes.ago} to
>> resolve.
>
> Yeah, I just realized that it's a bug in the @{u} implementation.

I don't think so. You probably need to modify branch_get(), because it
has a special case for "HEAD", and who knows if it's hard-coded in
other places. It's not just the @{u} implementation.

If we do the magic at the rev-parsing phase, all these details become
irrelevant.

FTR. @@{upstream} and @@{now} works just fine in v2 of my patch series.

-- 
Felipe Contreras