From: Felipe Contreras Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:27:02 GMT Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2012, #01; Sun, 3) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4FD4DBD7.5070204@lsrfire.ath.cx> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:39 PM, René Scharfe wrote: > Am 06.06.2012 20:17, schrieb Felipe Contreras: > >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> >>> Felipe Contreras writes: >>> >>>>> The last remaining sticking point is what to do with the duplicated >>>>> shell >>>>> function. >>>> >>>> >>>> What is the problem with leaving it as it is; having it as a duplicate >>>> function. It's not a *huge* maintenance burden, and it's a big problem >>>> if the functions diverge. > > > In the last sentence you say that there would be a "big problem". > > >>> It is not even funny to see these two conflicting claims made in a >>> single sentence.  Given that you are aware that it will cause a huge >>> problem to the end users if they diverge, >> >> >> What would be that *huge* problem? > > > Here you ask what's so bad about it. > > Perhaps you meant to write "it's NOT a big problem" in the first place? Yeap, that's what I meant. -- Felipe Contreras