From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 21:28:05 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] tests: add initial bash completion tests
Message-ID: <CAMP44s0xAvc9aTeBP81tXhX6Q67+7cQ-51C1AWrKPN7bc7=JXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v7gxs1ud4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 10:28:39PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>>
>>> Something is better than nothing.
>>
>> Yes, but...
>
> ;-)
>
> This is a good example that sometimes something is worse than nothing,
> unless watched carefully by a competent reviewer.

And this is a good example of why you shouldn't blindly trust what a
'competent reviewer' says, as I'm pretty sure the comment is wrong.

But hey, if you prefer nothing, fine, drop this patch; let's continue
to blindly modify the completion and fix regressions as they come. I
guess I should drop my other tests as well.

I was planning to do a bit of reorganization to the bash completion
after having some basic tests, but I'll just jump straight away to the
actual patches then.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras