From: Felipe Contreras Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:28:10 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] cherry-pick: add --skip-empty option Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <7vy5anxcxt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> Felipe Contreras writes: >>> >>>> Pretty much what it says on the tin. >>> >>> And a bit more, isn't it? >>> >>> The --keep-redundant-commits option implies the --allow-empty option >>> and it was perfectly acceptable to give both. By making sure that >>> only at most one of -k-r-d, -a-e or -s-e is given, this forbids that >>> usage. >>> >>> "It is implied so there is no *need* to give it redundantly" is >>> different from "It is implied so you shouldn't give it redundantly". >> >> Remove that line then. > > That's what the submitter does. Apparently "the submitter" does everything. It seems sending 800 patches in the past 3 months is not enough work for you. And what's the point? If nobody is interested in shifting from shell scripts to C, neither am I. Consider this series abandoned. -- Felipe Contreras