From: D. Ben Knoble Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:33:15 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: rerere-options.adoc: link to git-rerere(1) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 2:57 PM wrote: > > From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk > > Five commands include these options. Let’s link to the command so that > the curious user can learn more about what “rerere” is about. > > It’s also better to consistently refer to things like > e.g. “git-subcommand(1)” over `git subcommand` or `subcommand`. > > Also apply the same treatment to git-add(1). > > Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Haugsbakk > --- > > Notes (series): > Topic name (applied): kh/doc-rerere-options-xref > > v2: Same for git-add(1) and expand on the more general point of it all. > > Documentation/rerere-options.adoc | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc b/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc > index b0b920144a6..4395fe05356 100644 > --- a/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc > +++ b/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc > @@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ > the current conflict to update the files in the working > tree, allow it to also update the index with the result of > resolution. `--no-rerere-autoupdate` is a good way to > - double-check what `rerere` did and catch potential > + double-check what linkgit:git-rerere[1] did and catch potential > mismerges, before committing the result to the index with a > - separate `git add`. > + separate linkgit:git-add[1]. > > Interdiff against v1: > diff --git a/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc b/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc > index 115882edab1..4395fe05356 100644 > --- a/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc > +++ b/Documentation/rerere-options.adoc > @@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ > resolution. `--no-rerere-autoupdate` is a good way to > double-check what linkgit:git-rerere[1] did and catch potential > mismerges, before committing the result to the index with a > - separate `git add`. > + separate linkgit:git-add[1]. > > base-commit: 67ad42147a7acc2af6074753ebd03d904476118f > -- > 2.53.0.26.g2afa8602a26 Excellent, thanks for also including the rationale. LGTM! -- D. Ben Knoble