From: D. Ben Knoble <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2023 20:49:45 GMT
Subject: Re: grep: fix multibyte regex handling under macOS (1819ad327b7a1f19540a819813b70a0e8a7f798f)
Message-ID: <CALnO6CD_x5Dhh-x8wq6BGT10Qv7iPzsjZyD8Pun0GCKwKKRczw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANgJU+XNLqf0E2+YC8yxtRPVh=mevc3P0eeye2_nx=ULB2iVWw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 11:22 AM demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been lurking watching some of the regex discussion on the list
> and personally I think it is asking for trouble to use "whatever regex
> engine is traditional in a given environment" instead of just choosing
> a good open source engine and using it consistently everywhere.  I
> don't really buy the arguments I have seen to justify a policy of "use
> the standard library version"; regex engines vary widely in
> performance and implementation and feature set, and even the really
> good ones do not entirely agree on every semantic[1], so if you don't
> standardize you will be forever dealing with bugs related to those
> differences.

My understanding is that the patch suspected in the subject and linked
several times in this thread _does_ use the native Darwin regex
library which causes the problem, but I can't reproduce it in a
smaller program (see previous mail).


-- 
D. Ben Knoble