From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 14:10:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] parse-options: introduce parse_subcommands
Message-ID: <CALkWK0nuJ2VrAUD5PsfnZzO5yDgB+h4xn8g=CTqmUvJ8DOdPNQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vlik3t3j2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi Junio,

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>  I found this patch in one of my branches from a long time ago.  I
>>  haven't written documentation and tests yet because I'm not fully
>>  convinced that I like this.
>>
>>  Thoughts?
>
> It looks like a static version of string_list_lookup() and does not
> have much reason to tie it to "subcommand".

How so?  I can use a string_list to keep subcommand->name and stuff
the callback into util.  Where do I put subcommand->help then?
I agree that there's no reason to tie it to subcommand though.

Ram