From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 03:49:50 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] completion: clarify ls-tree, archive, show completion
Message-ID: <CALkWK0nMWPvVBXEyM5TwCC+0LGvLGbUVXPBhewY8X4==nHELSQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vehcjgkuq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I think this is the same as 5/6 and better explained in a single
> patch, as the rationale is the same: these commands can all take the
> usual revs and then paths, so using misnamed complete_FILE helper is
> wrong.
>
> Mind if I squashed them together?

I'm okay with what you've queued in pu (sans some points raised by
SZEDER; looking into that), but you can squash them together if you
like.