From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:41:44 GMT
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2013, #03; Thu, 6)
Message-ID: <CALkWK0nLa5tZfNvjYNAGx6zuA=49JSwZttCLhAE8+3ifBOA1FA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7v1u8amovl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> But it turns out that in the context of these functions it refers to
> "what users consider paths in objects stored in the object database"
> (as opposed to working tree paths).  That is what ls-tree would take
> (i.e. <tree-ish> and <tree-ish>:<path>).  And I do not offhand think
> of a better name myself to strongly oppose to using the word FILE to
> refer to what it does.

__git_complete_treeish().  Write a new patch with a proper comment
saying why it is aliased to __git_complete_revlist_file().