From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:57:05 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] revert: fix buffer overflow in insn sheet parser
Message-ID: <CALkWK0n3srWcsDxaWvgd7s7jHVuSKv+aLJ1n0inae2hMA_C3kQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vaa8va3xm.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Hi Junio and Jonathan,

Thanks for the good suggestions.  Will post the next iteration in a
few minutes (some tests running now).

Junio C Hamano writes:
> [...]
> When the log message justifies the cause and the approach in the right
> way, the actual patch becomes self evident. Also I often find myself
> coming up with a _better_ solution than the patch I originally prepared
> while writing the commit log message to explain it, and redoing the patch
> text to match the description.

Wow.  It looks like I have a long way to go :/
Maybe I should practice writing more Haskell.

-- Ram