From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:14:09 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] revert: Don't check lone argument in get_encoding Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20110712165949.GB13578@elie> Hi Jonathan, Jonathan Nieder writes: > Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: >> The get_encoding function has only one callsite, and its caller makes >> sure that a NULL argument isn't passed.  Don't unnecessarily double >> check the same argument in get_encoding. > > Such a double-check is not a huge maintenance burden, is it?  As I > mentioned at [1], I am guessing the actual motivation is (1) to avoid > having to pass "commit" around and (2) to avoid burdening translators > with a message that will never be shown. > > Would it be possible to clarify the commit message so it is no longer > necessary to guess? I should have done this earlier. Thanks for being so patient :) revert: Don't check lone argument in get_encoding The get_encoding function has only one callsite, and its caller makes sure that a NULL argument isn't passed. Don't unnecessarily double check the same argument in get_encoding. As a result, avoid passing "commit" around, and remove a string marked for translation that will never be shown. -- Ram