From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 16:16:50 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/18] revert: Remove sequencer state when no commits are pending
Message-ID: <CALkWK0mUGiCRQoW6UM+mF5tsn4DxRuaiXn0TS2CcEsR0OeusKg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110727154830.GA29924@elie>

Hi again,

Jonathan Nieder writes:
> If "tight coupling" means "builtin/commit.c calls a function declared
> in sequencer.h", then yes, I think it should be fine.

My bad. I'll first have to figure out a way to expose the todo parsing
functions (and dependent functions) without touching much else.
This'll be a huge non-trivial patch, and my post midterm work has to
include this anyway.  So I think it's better to leave it as-it-is for
now, and work on this coupling after this series is merged.

-- Ram