From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:32:48 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/7] Rework git core for native submodules
Message-ID: <CALkWK0kpf+AAzrLuqKQx5iv3nNKJ48R5etcBrcdoG46Z1ipgbQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7vy5cyexuf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Sounds like you are saying that you can pile a new command on top of
> new command to solve what the existing tools people are familar with
> can already solve in a consistent way without adding anything new.
> Are you going to dupliate various options to "git diff" and "git
> log" in "git diff-link"?  Will you then next need "git log-link"?

What I'm saying is: As always, we start with plumbing and work our way
up to porcelain.  We do have git diff-files, diff-index, diff-tree, so
I don't see what the problem with diff-link is.  The point is that we
can get an initial scripted version out quickly.

And no, I never suggested a git log-link.